ChatGPT SEO is not a new set of ranking tricks. It is whether ChatGPT's crawlers can read your page and find something worth quoting. OpenAI documents the mechanism: "OAI-SearchBot is used to surface websites in search results in ChatGPT's search features." If your robots.txt turns that bot away, no content fix will help. We audit access, readability and citability in one 164-check scan.
Whether ChatGPT cites your site comes down to a chain of four conditions, all true at the same time. Standard SEO tools cover one of them, partially. We cover all four.
Free Visibility Scan: whole site, up to 150 pages, no email. Full Report is a one-time $10.
Traditional SEO is about ranking in a list of blue links. LLM optimization, sometimes called GEO or AEO, is about being cited in a generated answer. The mechanisms overlap but are not identical. For a large language model to cite your page:
Guide depth: how to get cited by ChatGPT and why you're not cited by ChatGPT.
The free scan covers your whole site, up to 150 pages, and names every failing check worst first. The $10 Full Report unseals page-by-page detail plus the PDF, action plan and AI-ready fix file. The umbrella view lives at the AI search optimization hub.
No, and any tool that claims to do this reliably is overstating its capability. Live AI answers are generated at query time from a combination of retrieval, cached knowledge and model judgment. We audit the preconditions for citability, crawler access, content structure, schema, which are the factors you can actually control. Whether any given answer includes you depends on factors outside a static audit.
Partly. The access and indexing foundations overlap (robots.txt, crawlability, structured data). The content layer diverges: traditional SEO prioritizes keyword relevance and authority; LLM optimization additionally rewards specific extractable claims, clear passage structure and entity clarity. We score both layers in one scan.
Several reasons are common: a retrieval bot block you did not intend, a JavaScript-rendered page the AI crawler sees as blank, or content that ranks for keywords but does not contain a specific quotable claim. Our report diagnoses which of these applies. Read more: why you're not cited by ChatGPT.
llms.txt is an emerging convention, not yet a formal standard, that lets you point non-Google AI crawlers to your most important pages. It is optional and not a ranking signal for Google. We report its status accurately and do not overstate its impact. If you want one, our free llms.txt generator builds it.
Free scan of your whole site, up to 150 pages. Grounded in official crawler documentation from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Perplexity, and we link to all of it.
164 graded checks · every check maps to a documented mechanism · no email